Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Ready to collect mo data on 6.5 creedmoor
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lonewatie" data-source="post: 3169768" data-attributes="member: 44089"><p>It does, and only one variable needs changed at once. You cant change bullets, velocity, and seating depth at one time trying to focus on something as irrelevant as rpm. Build a load, typically starting with a ladder test knowing already that the manufacturers have already given you baseline for their testing of that bullet/powder/primer combination. Hornady, nosler, sierra, berger, etc etc etc, are NOT going to release load data that doesnt function with their bullets properly. All a shooter needs to be concerned with while selecting a bullet is the twist rate of his barrel. That is knowledge that was around before computers, its a given, and it will never change. Theres no reason to introduce something such as "rpm" to a newer/lesser experienced reloader when the bullet manufacturer already has covered that for them. Not all bullets of the proper weight range will function in all weapons of a given cartridge, much less caliber. The entire purpose of custom loading is so you have ammunition that "fits" that particular rifle. </p><p></p><p>Having someone take 5 steps back when developing a load that is obviously stabile at a closer distance isnt a good thing. </p><p></p><p>Learning what certain things do and why they change thingstheway they do is much more educational than not understanding why a computer told them something wouldnt work. </p><p></p><p>So many people have figured this out on their own its not even funny.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lonewatie, post: 3169768, member: 44089"] It does, and only one variable needs changed at once. You cant change bullets, velocity, and seating depth at one time trying to focus on something as irrelevant as rpm. Build a load, typically starting with a ladder test knowing already that the manufacturers have already given you baseline for their testing of that bullet/powder/primer combination. Hornady, nosler, sierra, berger, etc etc etc, are NOT going to release load data that doesnt function with their bullets properly. All a shooter needs to be concerned with while selecting a bullet is the twist rate of his barrel. That is knowledge that was around before computers, its a given, and it will never change. Theres no reason to introduce something such as "rpm" to a newer/lesser experienced reloader when the bullet manufacturer already has covered that for them. Not all bullets of the proper weight range will function in all weapons of a given cartridge, much less caliber. The entire purpose of custom loading is so you have ammunition that "fits" that particular rifle. Having someone take 5 steps back when developing a load that is obviously stabile at a closer distance isnt a good thing. Learning what certain things do and why they change thingstheway they do is much more educational than not understanding why a computer told them something wouldnt work. So many people have figured this out on their own its not even funny. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Ready to collect mo data on 6.5 creedmoor
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom