Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Recall James Lankford
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeUSooner" data-source="post: 4209117" data-attributes="member: 55109"><p>I've always maintained two "truisms," based upon straightforward human psychology.</p><p></p><p>1) Severity of punishment is not as effective as <u>certainty</u> of punishment, and</p><p>2) When the cost of taking an action is greater than the participant is willing to pay, that action will not be taken in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Based upon those 'givens,' just a single well-publicized incident of a border guard firing <em>at</em> - near, around, toward, close to, etc. (not, necessarily, hitting) - an approaching column of "illegal-want-to-be"s will [note: that's not "might" or "may" or "could," I said <strong>will</strong>] result in a distinct reduction in future border-crossing attempts. Even if it does not entirely eliminate all future attempts, a significant and permanent numerical reduction will in fact result. Which is a <em>preventative</em> measure that is at least a step in the correct direction!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeUSooner, post: 4209117, member: 55109"] I've always maintained two "truisms," based upon straightforward human psychology. 1) Severity of punishment is not as effective as [U]certainty[/U] of punishment, and 2) When the cost of taking an action is greater than the participant is willing to pay, that action will not be taken in the first place. Based upon those 'givens,' just a single well-publicized incident of a border guard firing [I]at[/I] - near, around, toward, close to, etc. (not, necessarily, hitting) - an approaching column of "illegal-want-to-be"s will [note: that's not "might" or "may" or "could," I said [B]will[/B]] result in a distinct reduction in future border-crossing attempts. Even if it does not entirely eliminate all future attempts, a significant and permanent numerical reduction will in fact result. Which is a [I]preventative[/I] measure that is at least a step in the correct direction! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Recall James Lankford
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom