Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Reciprocity is Currently Banned Under Federal Law (Very Important Please Read)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AC37" data-source="post: 500422" data-attributes="member: 133"><p>I agree we need to obey the law, and the Second Amendment is the highest law of the land. This is a perfect example of illegal law, law which is not legal because it violates the highest law of the land. It absolutely does need to be challenged and go away.</p><p></p><p>For those of you who did not hear, activism just succeeded in getting rid of illegal law banning National Parks CCW - Fed law now accedes to state law on this subject. This means you can now carry without violating (illegal) Federal law in OK, and many other states.</p><p></p><p>Just because this is an issue I have spent so much time studying, and a brief primer for newcomers on this subject - there is absolutely no room or legality for gun control laws under the Second Amendment - "Shall not be infringed" does not leave any wiggle room on the subject whatsoever. The 2nd Amendment is an individual right - a perspective reaffirmed over the summer by the SC, though they did not reaffirm the latter part (unsuprisingly) - though the latter part has long been affirmed by the laws of two states - not only Vermont, but Alaska as well. The SC is, as usual, stacked with wussies who are well behind the curve and unwilling to rock the boat too much - just like they did in the Dred Scott case - where the SC could not find that black people were human beings and not merely property, because then they would have to be afforded all the rights given to every other United States citizen.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line: don't hold your breath for the SC to sweep illegal law away - we're going to have to do things ourselves with grassroots activism. Much behind the curve they'll come up and reaffirm things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AC37, post: 500422, member: 133"] I agree we need to obey the law, and the Second Amendment is the highest law of the land. This is a perfect example of illegal law, law which is not legal because it violates the highest law of the land. It absolutely does need to be challenged and go away. For those of you who did not hear, activism just succeeded in getting rid of illegal law banning National Parks CCW - Fed law now accedes to state law on this subject. This means you can now carry without violating (illegal) Federal law in OK, and many other states. Just because this is an issue I have spent so much time studying, and a brief primer for newcomers on this subject - there is absolutely no room or legality for gun control laws under the Second Amendment - "Shall not be infringed" does not leave any wiggle room on the subject whatsoever. The 2nd Amendment is an individual right - a perspective reaffirmed over the summer by the SC, though they did not reaffirm the latter part (unsuprisingly) - though the latter part has long been affirmed by the laws of two states - not only Vermont, but Alaska as well. The SC is, as usual, stacked with wussies who are well behind the curve and unwilling to rock the boat too much - just like they did in the Dred Scott case - where the SC could not find that black people were human beings and not merely property, because then they would have to be afforded all the rights given to every other United States citizen. Bottom line: don't hold your breath for the SC to sweep illegal law away - we're going to have to do things ourselves with grassroots activism. Much behind the curve they'll come up and reaffirm things. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Reciprocity is Currently Banned Under Federal Law (Very Important Please Read)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom