Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Reloading help requested...Pistol & Rifle
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2452493" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>The scuttlebutt I heard supposedly came from an Alliant rep. It was that e3 "has an identical burn rate to Red Dot but produces about 10% more energy". And the recommendation from Alliant was to use Red Dot, but if they insisted on using e3 start with Red Dot data and back off 10%. This was just them covering their butts because they have ZERO testing with e3 in metallic cartridges. There is a fairly extensive amount of data on Brian Enos' site for e3 and there are more than one who say it's just not as fast burning as the charts indicate. Some even say that it's possibly slower than N320. In most of the charts e3 is right up there with N310 and Red Dot. My impression is that e3 is indeed as fast as they say but is just very well behaved and not as "peaky" as most very fast powders. I say this because I get a very linear velocity curve from my chrono and can see the difference in just .1 grain increments. I've never been able to discern a difference by changing powder charges .1 grains and usually go .2 grains at a time for pistol. And I've taken e3 past where one could go with N310 or Clays and still had no pressure problems or velocity spikes.</p><p></p><p>As I said before it is a fast powder, so be careful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2452493, member: 3099"] The scuttlebutt I heard supposedly came from an Alliant rep. It was that e3 "has an identical burn rate to Red Dot but produces about 10% more energy". And the recommendation from Alliant was to use Red Dot, but if they insisted on using e3 start with Red Dot data and back off 10%. This was just them covering their butts because they have ZERO testing with e3 in metallic cartridges. There is a fairly extensive amount of data on Brian Enos' site for e3 and there are more than one who say it's just not as fast burning as the charts indicate. Some even say that it's possibly slower than N320. In most of the charts e3 is right up there with N310 and Red Dot. My impression is that e3 is indeed as fast as they say but is just very well behaved and not as "peaky" as most very fast powders. I say this because I get a very linear velocity curve from my chrono and can see the difference in just .1 grain increments. I've never been able to discern a difference by changing powder charges .1 grains and usually go .2 grains at a time for pistol. And I've taken e3 past where one could go with N310 or Clays and still had no pressure problems or velocity spikes. As I said before it is a fast powder, so be careful. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Reloading help requested...Pistol & Rifle
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom