Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Remember the councilman who walked out because of an armed citizen?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dutchwrangler" data-source="post: 2100547" data-attributes="member: 4650"><p>I give credit to the city attorney for pointing out that had the motion to check firearms been passed it would have been null & void as per the Washington state laws.</p><p></p><p>Would have been interesting to see what would have happened had it passed. And whether the police would have taken action to abide by the motion and consequently violate their oath in turn.</p><p></p><p>Something every person, be they politician or other servant, who takes an oath to the Constitution needs to understand... that they have a <strong>fiduciary</strong> duty to follow the terms of the constitutions and subsequent laws they take an oath to defend, that they be honest, that they represent the interests of the people and that they treat citizens as impartially as possible. And finally that they are to account to the public for their actions.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, those government servants on the anti-Second Amendment side are violating this oath without question. Thus, they are not qualified to hold the position they hold and should be removed and barred for life from every holding the trust of the public as they are not trustworthy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dutchwrangler, post: 2100547, member: 4650"] I give credit to the city attorney for pointing out that had the motion to check firearms been passed it would have been null & void as per the Washington state laws. Would have been interesting to see what would have happened had it passed. And whether the police would have taken action to abide by the motion and consequently violate their oath in turn. Something every person, be they politician or other servant, who takes an oath to the Constitution needs to understand... that they have a [B]fiduciary[/B] duty to follow the terms of the constitutions and subsequent laws they take an oath to defend, that they be honest, that they represent the interests of the people and that they treat citizens as impartially as possible. And finally that they are to account to the public for their actions. Unfortunately, those government servants on the anti-Second Amendment side are violating this oath without question. Thus, they are not qualified to hold the position they hold and should be removed and barred for life from every holding the trust of the public as they are not trustworthy. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Remember the councilman who walked out because of an armed citizen?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom