Pretty good gig.
Pretty good gig.
And probably draw social security at the same level
I bet she would not have retired if she had been 'retained.' Otherwise, why file?
What a crunch.
She most likely has been drawing SS for several years. One can work and draw
SS at the same time, I did.
Little motivation to not draw it once you reach full retirement age or 70. Maybe if you’re on the low end and think you’ll be getting a significant income increase maybe. And maybe not, I don’t know.
Last edited:
Wonder what the retirement check is for a U.S. senator or congressman?
Don’t feel like looking it up but I bet it’s better than most public servants.
Don’t feel like looking it up but I bet it’s better than most public servants.
She’s been drawing it already for 20ish + years. As long as you reach FRA (full retirement age) you can draw without any income penalty.
BTW- I voted to retain NO judges on Nov 5th.
The question truly is, has she through bad decisions cost the tax payers more than $162,000. I doubt she will be drawing it for long, looks like the photo was taken in 1952, how old is she? 108?
The real question is, why are government pukes getting so much more than taxpayers?
