Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Remember when socialism was a dirty word?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chuter" data-source="post: 2845479" data-attributes="member: 13693"><p>From the article:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe the kid wouldn't have the backpack ripped from his hands leaving him with nothing, but he will have some of it taken from him without his permission. Sounds like playground bullies to me.</p><p></p><p>Edit:</p><p></p><p>Dr. Lack spends a good part of his article trying to impugn the character of the first professor, as if that will discredit the argument.</p><p></p><p>Dr. Lack's point about the difference between socialism and democratic socialism may be valid, but if so then he doesn't need to point out what he doesn't like about the first guy.</p><p></p><p>Dr. Lack is using his moral judgement to say the kid with more food should share and if he doesn't then some should be taken from him: how about others offering to trade something for food instead of just taking it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chuter, post: 2845479, member: 13693"] From the article: Maybe the kid wouldn't have the backpack ripped from his hands leaving him with nothing, but he will have some of it taken from him without his permission. Sounds like playground bullies to me. Edit: Dr. Lack spends a good part of his article trying to impugn the character of the first professor, as if that will discredit the argument. Dr. Lack's point about the difference between socialism and democratic socialism may be valid, but if so then he doesn't need to point out what he doesn't like about the first guy. Dr. Lack is using his moral judgement to say the kid with more food should share and if he doesn't then some should be taken from him: how about others offering to trade something for food instead of just taking it? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Remember when socialism was a dirty word?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom