Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Report: Thousands Of Suspects In Baltimore Arrests Required Medical Attention
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2746904" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>How does the fact that the statistics are largely generated by the specimens being investigated color the analysis?</p><p></p><p>"Well, Mr. Prosecutor, I know you're accusing me of assault and armed robbery, but I investigated myself, and I've determined that nothing improper happened."</p><p></p><p>Do you think that <em>might</em> just tend to reduce the apparent rate of malfeasance? Moreover, even if the investigation is conducted impartially, do you think the special privileges extended (like, say, a ten-day wait before questioning, and the right to review all evidence before questioning--rights that are not extended to us mere mortals) <em>might</em> tend to reduce the apparent rate? Or do you not think critically about claims made and data proffered (regardless of the source)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2746904, member: 13624"] How does the fact that the statistics are largely generated by the specimens being investigated color the analysis? "Well, Mr. Prosecutor, I know you're accusing me of assault and armed robbery, but I investigated myself, and I've determined that nothing improper happened." Do you think that [I]might[/I] just tend to reduce the apparent rate of malfeasance? Moreover, even if the investigation is conducted impartially, do you think the special privileges extended (like, say, a ten-day wait before questioning, and the right to review all evidence before questioning--rights that are not extended to us mere mortals) [I]might[/I] tend to reduce the apparent rate? Or do you not think critically about claims made and data proffered (regardless of the source)? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Report: Thousands Of Suspects In Baltimore Arrests Required Medical Attention
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom