Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 1975311" data-attributes="member: 229">Again - reports huh?&nbsp; <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" data-shortname=":D" />&nbsp; Have these folks turned these cases into the election boards for their districts and reported them so that the fraudulent voters can be put in jail for up to 1 year or pay the $500 fine?&nbsp; They should show up in statistics (and yes, you can track voter fraud without IDs - its 2012 and we have interwebz).&nbsp; I&#039;m not saying voter fraud doesn&#039;t happen man, I&#039;m just saying it&#039;s not exactly as rampant as Fox News is saying (just like racist-disenfranchisement isn&#039;t as bad as the Dems are reporting).Neither candidate was popular until after Obama-fever took over before Barack&#039;s first term - hell, he almost tied with Hillary (Romney is probably the least-popular republican ever to run for office).They&#039;re not all winners...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 1975311, member: 229"] Again - reports huh? :D Have these folks turned these cases into the election boards for their districts and reported them so that the fraudulent voters can be put in jail for up to 1 year or pay the $500 fine? They should show up in statistics (and yes, you can track voter fraud without IDs - its 2012 and we have interwebz). I'm not saying voter fraud doesn't happen man, I'm just saying it's not exactly as rampant as Fox News is saying (just like racist-disenfranchisement isn't as bad as the Dems are reporting). Neither candidate was popular until after Obama-fever took over before Barack's first term - hell, he almost tied with Hillary (Romney is probably the least-popular republican ever to run for office). They're not all winners... [/QUOTE]

Verification