Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Rifle training pictures
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nonsensitive" data-source="post: 1145881" data-attributes="member: 12188"><p>Hey! You've not gotten anyone's panties in a wad. Those that disagree with you don't wear panties like you and TWSS. </p><p>If either one of you had to put up with what LE's did you would P your little pink panties. </p><p></p><p>What everyone is attempting to respond to is your ridiculous logic. You guys contradict yourselves. In your philosophies and your statements. Unbelieveable! </p><p>In the same sentence you say your not against LE's having rifles, then reverse and say in the same sentence or paragraph they don't need them because these SHTF situations don't happen everyday. You can't have things both ways like each of you put it. Do you shoot someone in self-defense once a week? WHAT? NO! </p><p>Then by your ridiculous logic, YOU should not have a gun of any kind. NO. You don't NEED a gun for sport or hunting. We've been talking Life or Death situations for guns. </p><p>Not sport. Let's be fair. Law Enforcement does not carry them for sport or hunting. Or, to look COOL like one of you put it.</p><p></p><p>Law Enforcement, does not shoot , tase , baton , or pepperspray every idiot dirtbag that deserves it. Not only do Officers not FIRE rifles at suspects 10 times a day like you <u>*%&#@*! </u>allege to be necessary to justify having them. They do not use the other tools available to them as well. So why not say LEO's don't need handguns, or anything else?</p><p></p><p>Hey. Check out this story <a href="http://connect.lawofficer.com/forum/topics/arkansas-officers-killed-1" target="_blank">http://connect.lawofficer.com/forum/topics/arkansas-officers-killed-1</a> </p><p></p><p>This is a current, tragic, real SHTF story. Please try to take this recent, true story, about 2 Officers shot and killed, 2 other Officers wounded, and give a rational explanation why <u>every responding</u> officer should not have a rifle. Give us your philosophy. </p><p></p><p>As far as I can see.. Your points (as you call them) are NOT VALID... They make no sense..You have made NO POINT. You have made STATEMENTS that are neither rational or reasonable. It's beginng to look like that is your sole intent. </p><p>Please. I'm open. You have the oportunity to convince me and a few others you have 'valid" points. That I am wrong. This story is a perfect example.</p><p>Let's see your evaluation of this story.........</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nonsensitive, post: 1145881, member: 12188"] Hey! You've not gotten anyone's panties in a wad. Those that disagree with you don't wear panties like you and TWSS. If either one of you had to put up with what LE's did you would P your little pink panties. What everyone is attempting to respond to is your ridiculous logic. You guys contradict yourselves. In your philosophies and your statements. Unbelieveable! In the same sentence you say your not against LE's having rifles, then reverse and say in the same sentence or paragraph they don't need them because these SHTF situations don't happen everyday. You can't have things both ways like each of you put it. Do you shoot someone in self-defense once a week? WHAT? NO! Then by your ridiculous logic, YOU should not have a gun of any kind. NO. You don't NEED a gun for sport or hunting. We've been talking Life or Death situations for guns. Not sport. Let's be fair. Law Enforcement does not carry them for sport or hunting. Or, to look COOL like one of you put it. Law Enforcement, does not shoot , tase , baton , or pepperspray every idiot dirtbag that deserves it. Not only do Officers not FIRE rifles at suspects 10 times a day like you [U]*%&#@*! [/U]allege to be necessary to justify having them. They do not use the other tools available to them as well. So why not say LEO's don't need handguns, or anything else? Hey. Check out this story [url]http://connect.lawofficer.com/forum/topics/arkansas-officers-killed-1[/url] This is a current, tragic, real SHTF story. Please try to take this recent, true story, about 2 Officers shot and killed, 2 other Officers wounded, and give a rational explanation why [U]every responding[/U] officer should not have a rifle. Give us your philosophy. As far as I can see.. Your points (as you call them) are NOT VALID... They make no sense..You have made NO POINT. You have made STATEMENTS that are neither rational or reasonable. It's beginng to look like that is your sole intent. Please. I'm open. You have the oportunity to convince me and a few others you have 'valid" points. That I am wrong. This story is a perfect example. Let's see your evaluation of this story......... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Rifle training pictures
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom