Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Josh-L" data-source="post: 1145925" data-attributes="member: 219">You contradict yourself three times in the same paragraph.&nbsp; This is the reason we are unclear on your &quot;points&quot;.&nbsp; I would also like to know where you obtain your &quot;statistics&quot; from on officer involved shooting?&nbsp; I honestly would like to know them.&nbsp; It has been asked numerous times... What is your point?&nbsp; It has changed several times throughout this thread.&nbsp; First it was you didn&#039;t want us training with rifles because when this mythical Obama civilian army arrives we will be training them, which by the way has an even lesser chance of happening then me needing to shoot a rifle on duty.&nbsp; Your second &quot;point&quot; then changed to &quot;statistics&quot;.&nbsp; I will ask you just as I asked your buddy... where do you get your numbers on officer involved shootings?&nbsp; Your third &quot;point&quot; then turned to tax money.&nbsp; I always love this argument.&nbsp; Since you are so well informed can you tell me how much of your tax dollars your local law enforcement agency sees?&nbsp; Seeing as how you&#039;re so concerned on how it is spent I&#039;m sure you have researched this.&nbsp; Please do so and let us know your findings.&nbsp; I know you won&#039;t so I&#039;ll fill you in.&nbsp; Your police department does NOT get enough tax dollars from YOU over the course of an entire year to fund the purchase of one single rifle.&nbsp; I will also fill you in on a little secret....&nbsp; I would bet 90% of rifles being carried by officers in this entire state were purchased by the individual officer.&nbsp; Of course I don&#039;t know the actual number, just like all the numbers you&#039;ve stated, but I bet I&#039;m pretty close.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Josh-L, post: 1145925, member: 219"] You contradict yourself three times in the same paragraph. This is the reason we are unclear on your "points". I would also like to know where you obtain your "statistics" from on officer involved shooting? I honestly would like to know them. It has been asked numerous times... What is your point? It has changed several times throughout this thread. First it was you didn't want us training with rifles because when this mythical Obama civilian army arrives we will be training them, which by the way has an even lesser chance of happening then me needing to shoot a rifle on duty. Your second "point" then changed to "statistics". I will ask you just as I asked your buddy... where do you get your numbers on officer involved shootings? Your third "point" then turned to tax money. I always love this argument. Since you are so well informed can you tell me how much of your tax dollars your local law enforcement agency sees? Seeing as how you're so concerned on how it is spent I'm sure you have researched this. Please do so and let us know your findings. I know you won't so I'll fill you in. Your police department does NOT get enough tax dollars from YOU over the course of an entire year to fund the purchase of one single rifle. I will also fill you in on a little secret.... I would bet 90% of rifles being carried by officers in this entire state were purchased by the individual officer. Of course I don't know the actual number, just like all the numbers you've stated, but I bet I'm pretty close. [/QUOTE]

Verification