Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hobbes" data-source="post: 1932991" data-attributes="member: 3371">Now you&#039;re catching on.You have to start thinking like Romney to understand him.Speaking of which, here is the escape clause in Romney&#039;s mea culpa that I promised.When he said &quot;I was completely wrong&quot; did he mean he was wrong about the complete speech before his donors(47% and all that)?ORdid he mean he was completely wrong about only part of the speech?At some point he is going to &#039;evolve&#039; to the position that he meant he was wrong about the part where he said &quot;it&#039;s not my job to worry about the 47%&quot; and he is going maintain his position on the rest of the speech.But you wouldn&#039;t know that from what he said to Hannity wednesday night.The way he said it allowed you to jump to the conclusion that he meant what he said &quot;I was completely wrong&quot;.You heard it here first.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hobbes, post: 1932991, member: 3371"] Now you're catching on. You have to start thinking like Romney to understand him. Speaking of which, here is the escape clause in Romney's mea culpa that I promised. When he said "I was completely wrong" did he mean he was wrong about the complete speech before his donors(47% and all that)? OR did he mean he was completely wrong about only part of the speech? At some point he is going to 'evolve' to the position that he meant he was wrong about the part where he said "it's not my job to worry about the 47%" and he is going maintain his position on the rest of the speech. But you wouldn't know that from what he said to Hannity wednesday night. The way he said it allowed you to jump to the conclusion that he meant what he said "I was completely wrong". You heard it here first. [/QUOTE]

Verification