Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ron Paul for President
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1683321" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>So you're saying that his support for perpetual authorization for military action against individuals and entities unilaterally declared by the Executive Branch to be suspected of having links that directly or indirectly support the idea of terrorism is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution?</p><p></p><p>So you're saying that his support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which codifies that same-sex unions/marriages/partnerships not be recognized on equal grounds as heterosexual unions/marriages/partnerships at the federal level, is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution?</p><p></p><p>So you're saying that his support of neutralizing a part of the Constitution meant to ensure that private individuals would not be subject to redistribution of their property to those who a government entity determined would generate more tax revenue from that property is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution?</p><p></p><p>So you're saying that his support of neutralizing a part of the Constitution meant to ensure that individuals' privacy would not be encroached upon within their own bedrooms is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1683321, member: 5151"] So you're saying that his support for perpetual authorization for military action against individuals and entities unilaterally declared by the Executive Branch to be suspected of having links that directly or indirectly support the idea of terrorism is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution? So you're saying that his support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which codifies that same-sex unions/marriages/partnerships not be recognized on equal grounds as heterosexual unions/marriages/partnerships at the federal level, is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution? So you're saying that his support of neutralizing a part of the Constitution meant to ensure that private individuals would not be subject to redistribution of their property to those who a government entity determined would generate more tax revenue from that property is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution? So you're saying that his support of neutralizing a part of the Constitution meant to ensure that individuals' privacy would not be encroached upon within their own bedrooms is 100% compliant with the boundaries set forth by the Constitution? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ron Paul for President
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom