Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger LC9s
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henschman" data-source="post: 2597989" data-attributes="member: 4235"><p>They have moved in the right direction by going to striker fire, but the mag disconnect is a big negative for me. Maybe it's easy to disable, I don't know. But I do know that any pistol I'm going to carry damn sure needs to be one I can dry fire. If this had been out a couple years ago when I was looking for a pocket 9, I might have looked harder at Ruger. I was transitioning away from a Kel Tec, and wasn't interested in another gun with a long, heavy DA pull, so I ruled out the LC9 pretty quick. I ended up going with the Kahr CM9, and couldn't be happier. It has a lot of travel for a striker fired gun, but it isn't too bad and breaks light and smooth. It reminds me of a highly tuned DA revolver with a super light pull. I can fire as fast as I will ever need to with it. It is also smaller than any other pocket 9 I looked at... it fits in any of my pockets pretty easily.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henschman, post: 2597989, member: 4235"] They have moved in the right direction by going to striker fire, but the mag disconnect is a big negative for me. Maybe it's easy to disable, I don't know. But I do know that any pistol I'm going to carry damn sure needs to be one I can dry fire. If this had been out a couple years ago when I was looking for a pocket 9, I might have looked harder at Ruger. I was transitioning away from a Kel Tec, and wasn't interested in another gun with a long, heavy DA pull, so I ruled out the LC9 pretty quick. I ended up going with the Kahr CM9, and couldn't be happier. It has a lot of travel for a striker fired gun, but it isn't too bad and breaks light and smooth. It reminds me of a highly tuned DA revolver with a super light pull. I can fire as fast as I will ever need to with it. It is also smaller than any other pocket 9 I looked at... it fits in any of my pockets pretty easily. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Ruger LC9s
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom