Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 1994379" data-attributes="member: 7900">Actually, if you are referring to the election and re-election of Obama, it would be that &quot;the country has spoken twice in 4 years.&quot;&nbsp; 2008 and then 2012.&nbsp; However, also keep in mind that the election in 2010 had an entirely different outcome than what the Democrats (and the media) wanted it to be.&nbsp; They tried deriding the &quot;Tea Party&quot; movement (and still are), but 2010 brought about the fact that the Republicans got control of the House of Representatives again, several governors went from Democrat to Republican (including a few &quot;blue&quot; states), and over 620 state legislature seats nationwide went Republican.So, Obama&#039;s &quot;historical&quot; elections were separated by the 2010 election, and it could happen again.Elections are like tides.&nbsp; The voting public may not be pleased by Obama&#039;s actions and it swing back to a Republican in 2016.&nbsp; Unless the Dems can find another &quot;candidate with charisma&quot; to run as a &quot;historical&quot; candidate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 1994379, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3] Actually, if you are referring to the election and re-election of Obama, it would be that "the country has spoken twice in [B]4[/B] years." 2008 and then 2012. However, also keep in mind that the election in 2010 had an entirely different outcome than what the Democrats (and the media) wanted it to be. They tried deriding the "Tea Party" movement (and still are), but 2010 brought about the fact that the Republicans got control of the House of Representatives again, several governors went from Democrat to Republican (including a few "blue" states), and over 620 state legislature seats nationwide went Republican. So, Obama's "historical" elections were separated by the 2010 election, and it could happen again. Elections are like tides. The voting public may not be pleased by Obama's actions and it swing back to a Republican in 2016. Unless the Dems can find another "candidate with charisma" to run as a "historical" candidate.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification