S&W 342 vs 340

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

loslosbaby

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
264
Reaction score
2
Location
OKC, Oklahoma
I carried a 340PD for 5 years and sold it.

(Photo note: that 340 on the bottom has aftermarket laser grips on it...otherwise the 340 and 342 have the same exact grips)

Here's why:
- Ti cylinder has a delicate finish. Literally the first cylinder full of ammo (38) engraved it and broke the finish. I called customer support and that's a problem apparently

- I am a big boy with stout hands and the 340PD was one of THE most brutal weapons I've shot ever, ever, with .357 in it. Bren 10, Auto-Mag, any of the Cassull-capable pistols, geesh...not as much movement as a 500X but the shockwave part of it just as brutal. CRACK!

- There's perfectly good pistols like the 340 for half the money.

- (I needed the money at the time, foolish, never sell guns!)

- I wanted to side-grade to a steel cylinder and a tune-up from S&W (after 5 years of carrying it day-in-day-out in the front pocket) was half the difference

Now here's the flip-side if you figure it out, the 340PD is like a custom shop gun:
- perfect trigger
- hi-viz sites (I had green and liked them)
- 100$ grip (bantam)
- lanyard loop in butt of grip
- lock (love-em-or-hate-em-they're-here)
- relieved trigger
- push-rod in nicely recessed barrel shroud with ball-detent

A lot of that was custom work back in the day.

I am going to have another J-frame (two actually) soonish as far as plans go, but, I'd prefer steel cylinders. Steel is the only magic metal.

Years of experience in the "Fleet" (as pilots put it) with firearm metals:

300 Years: Steel
30 Years: Stainless Steel
11 Years: Titanium

Says it all for me.

G.
 

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
don't know about getting a hump back design....

for carry purposes... can't imagine needing single action. if I'm going to practice... needs to be in mode that's actually needed... double action.
 

okie98

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
5,477
Reaction score
437
Location
Yukon, OK
I have to agree with GED's post. I carry a 638 daily and would not switch to any of the other choices. I also have a model 49 for occasions where weight is not a factor. I prefer the hump to my 640 or even my 940.
 

loslosbaby

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
264
Reaction score
2
Location
OKC, Oklahoma
Follow-up: I am the happy owner of a 642 (no lock) now. Bought it off the board, love the Stainless Steel cylinder, +P, only a skosh heavier.

Love it! Noooooobody knows I'm carrying that type of weapon, even in the beach shorts I wear all summer.

I carry it in this holster and recommend it highly. Will mold to the weapon (by body heat) in about two weeks.

G.
 

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
old thread back from the dead...

might as well update too ... ended up with a 340PD simply due to availability.
searched up and down for a 342 without luck.

did find a 337PD, which is the exposed hammer version of 342PD.
337PD is unbelievably light and gives the single action option.

then a deal on a 340PD popped on OSA ... thought why not?
after switching back and fort between 337PD and 340PD for several months.
finally decided 340PD fits me better.

now 337PD is a safe queen and CCW 340PD with full house .357

ahome.tulsaconnect.com_toug_cpf_340pd337pd.JPG
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom