Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Santorum's Wife Sued Doctor For $500,000, Despite Senator's Calls For Tort Reform
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JB Books" data-source="post: 1721389" data-attributes="member: 6889"><p>Billybob, it depends on the type of case. If a case has already been decided, then typically that's it. The term is res judicata, latin for "already decided." If the person can PROVE there was a fraud on the court, or have some basis to introduce new evidence (such as the DNA that frees people from time to time), then maybe they can get a technical "d over."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JB Books, post: 1721389, member: 6889"] Billybob, it depends on the type of case. If a case has already been decided, then typically that's it. The term is res judicata, latin for "already decided." If the person can PROVE there was a fraud on the court, or have some basis to introduce new evidence (such as the DNA that frees people from time to time), then maybe they can get a technical "d over." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Santorum's Wife Sued Doctor For $500,000, Despite Senator's Calls For Tort Reform
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom