Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
SBR vs Pistol w/forearm brace
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yeti695" data-source="post: 3235776" data-attributes="member: 43286"><p>Ok, to me this was a way to say hey we can so what we want and you can’t say anything. This is also why for a long while you couldn’t shoulder a brace, than you could, and not….back and forth for a few months. I personally understand why you would want to carry a mid-sized rifle caliber around if I lived somewhere where there was a high threat of mass shooting or a horde of zombies coming around the corner. I don’t live in places like that and I don’t go to those places to often. I understand that mass shootings can happen anywhere at any time, but I also try not to put myself in that situation where something like that might happen. I personally don’t understand why you want to push the issues of the law. When you start to get in that grey area it can usually end up bad for someone, either in jail or spending a lot of money to stay out of jail. I would never carry a rifle caliber pistol anywhere other than my property and then I would still rather have the rifle. So if you choose to carry an AR/AK pistol more power to you, but if I was a criminal wanting to do bad things, you would be my first target. .</p><p></p><p>21 O.S 1290.6. Prohibited Ammunition Any concealed or unconcealed handgun when carried in a manner authorized by the provisions of the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act and when loaded with any ammunition which is either a restricted bullet as defined by Section 1289.19 of this title or is larger than .45 caliber or is otherwise prohibited by law shall be deemed a prohibited weapon for purposes of the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punished for a criminal offense as provided by Section 1272 of this title or any other applicable provision of law. In addition to any criminal prosecution for a violation of the provisions of this section, the licensee shall be subject to an administrative fine of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), upon a hearing and determination by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation that the person is in violation of the provisions of this section.</p><p></p><p>So I don’t see a need for it, but to each there own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yeti695, post: 3235776, member: 43286"] Ok, to me this was a way to say hey we can so what we want and you can’t say anything. This is also why for a long while you couldn’t shoulder a brace, than you could, and not….back and forth for a few months. I personally understand why you would want to carry a mid-sized rifle caliber around if I lived somewhere where there was a high threat of mass shooting or a horde of zombies coming around the corner. I don’t live in places like that and I don’t go to those places to often. I understand that mass shootings can happen anywhere at any time, but I also try not to put myself in that situation where something like that might happen. I personally don’t understand why you want to push the issues of the law. When you start to get in that grey area it can usually end up bad for someone, either in jail or spending a lot of money to stay out of jail. I would never carry a rifle caliber pistol anywhere other than my property and then I would still rather have the rifle. So if you choose to carry an AR/AK pistol more power to you, but if I was a criminal wanting to do bad things, you would be my first target. . 21 O.S 1290.6. Prohibited Ammunition Any concealed or unconcealed handgun when carried in a manner authorized by the provisions of the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act and when loaded with any ammunition which is either a restricted bullet as defined by Section 1289.19 of this title or is larger than .45 caliber or is otherwise prohibited by law shall be deemed a prohibited weapon for purposes of the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punished for a criminal offense as provided by Section 1272 of this title or any other applicable provision of law. In addition to any criminal prosecution for a violation of the provisions of this section, the licensee shall be subject to an administrative fine of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), upon a hearing and determination by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation that the person is in violation of the provisions of this section. So I don’t see a need for it, but to each there own. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
SBR vs Pistol w/forearm brace
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom