Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 3592574" data-attributes="member: 5800">I believe yeah --- The lowest I saw was 1.355 and the highest was 1.363. So I should have put .004 technically. On the first round with these cases, I&#039;m not going to be as picky because I know they&#039;re going to get loaded up with test loads into a new upper, and a good chunk have dents and dings that are going to affect the way the round works anyways. Once the new trimmer gets here next Monday, that might make it more consistent on the second batch, but that&#039;d be a bonus. The Frankford Arsenal trimmer indexes on shoulder rather than the Acculine where the case is in the shell holder and it seems like the variance in the rim thickness is what&#039;s translating into a different in the OAL on the Acculine trimmed cases. All the first/second batch cases have got their first firing and are more uniform in the dents/dings aspect I&#039;ll trim again to a more consistent length using the same methodology on all the cases.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 3592574, member: 5800"] I believe yeah --- The lowest I saw was 1.355 and the highest was 1.363. So I should have put .004 technically. On the first round with these cases, I'm not going to be as picky because I know they're going to get loaded up with test loads into a new upper, and a good chunk have dents and dings that are going to affect the way the round works anyways. Once the new trimmer gets here next Monday, that might make it more consistent on the second batch, but that'd be a bonus. The Frankford Arsenal trimmer indexes on shoulder rather than the Acculine where the case is in the shell holder and it seems like the variance in the rim thickness is what's translating into a different in the OAL on the Acculine trimmed cases. All the first/second batch cases have got their first firing and are more uniform in the dents/dings aspect I'll trim again to a more consistent length using the same methodology on all the cases. [/QUOTE]

Verification