Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Security Screening - What Works?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="poopgiggle" data-source="post: 1378040" data-attributes="member: 6406"><p>There's too much focus on security at airports, IMO. That's just one attack vector out of many. Real security happens with intelligence and law enforcement; there's no rule that says terrorists have to attack airports, and we either go nuts (and broke) trying to defend all possible terrorist objectives or we get them at the source. The FBI has been doing a pretty good job, incidentally. Check out the guy in Oregon the busted. (EDIT And he wasn't attacking an airplane! Imagine that! The TSA wouldn't have done anything to catch that car bomb.)</p><p></p><p>Even if they WERE just attacking airports, if experienced law enforcement officers and intelligence operatives can't do their jobs, I don't think it's reasonable to expect some schmoe making $10/hour to pick up their slack. TSA employees are effectively drones following an algorithm, and that kind of security is normally pretty easily circumvented (ask me how I know!).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="poopgiggle, post: 1378040, member: 6406"] There's too much focus on security at airports, IMO. That's just one attack vector out of many. Real security happens with intelligence and law enforcement; there's no rule that says terrorists have to attack airports, and we either go nuts (and broke) trying to defend all possible terrorist objectives or we get them at the source. The FBI has been doing a pretty good job, incidentally. Check out the guy in Oregon the busted. (EDIT And he wasn't attacking an airplane! Imagine that! The TSA wouldn't have done anything to catch that car bomb.) Even if they WERE just attacking airports, if experienced law enforcement officers and intelligence operatives can't do their jobs, I don't think it's reasonable to expect some schmoe making $10/hour to pick up their slack. TSA employees are effectively drones following an algorithm, and that kind of security is normally pretty easily circumvented (ask me how I know!). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Security Screening - What Works?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom