Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Selling AR-15 pistols with a stabilizing brace
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 3963523" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>I think the key there would be more if someone owns/keep a short upper? The brace is a piece of plastic that can be used on any of their 16" rifles if they own them. What if a guy had a braced weapon and then decided to comply with the new rule change and threw away his brace. Well if he owns several STOCKS in his parts bin that were take-offs from OEM non-NFA rifles, then he'd have to throw all those way too if he still had the shorter upper...maybe even including the stocks that are mounted to his 16" rifles. The only way I see to comply with this (if constructive possession is commonplace) is for people to <u>throw away or destroy their short uppers or just the barrels and add a 16" barrel</u> (or just follow the new rules and register the SBR).</p><p></p><p>To me is seems, constructive possession is more related to having a short upper more so than a brace or stock that can already legally be used on any non-NFA rifle?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 3963523, member: 24531"] I think the key there would be more if someone owns/keep a short upper? The brace is a piece of plastic that can be used on any of their 16" rifles if they own them. What if a guy had a braced weapon and then decided to comply with the new rule change and threw away his brace. Well if he owns several STOCKS in his parts bin that were take-offs from OEM non-NFA rifles, then he'd have to throw all those way too if he still had the shorter upper...maybe even including the stocks that are mounted to his 16" rifles. The only way I see to comply with this (if constructive possession is commonplace) is for people to [U]throw away or destroy their short uppers or just the barrels and add a 16" barrel[/U] (or just follow the new rules and register the SBR). To me is seems, constructive possession is more related to having a short upper more so than a brace or stock that can already legally be used on any non-NFA rifle? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Selling AR-15 pistols with a stabilizing brace
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
