Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Senate rejects expanded background checks
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2170489" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>The reason the 4473 liars aren't generally is a mix - many "lies" are mistakes and even when the filer has no-kidding lied the penalty is considered small - 5 year max but generally no more than one year if it isn't a repeat (in a 2011 case a Federal magistrate gave a 40 month sentence to a man convicted of lying to buy two dozen guns to be resold in Mexico) - so Federal prosecutors don't want to "waste" their time. I happen to agree with you that proper enforcement of existing laws would be a better plan than more grand-standing with the law while accomplishing very little in reality.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2170489, member: 18914"] The reason the 4473 liars aren't generally is a mix - many "lies" are mistakes and even when the filer has no-kidding lied the penalty is considered small - 5 year max but generally no more than one year if it isn't a repeat (in a 2011 case a Federal magistrate gave a 40 month sentence to a man convicted of lying to buy two dozen guns to be resold in Mexico) - so Federal prosecutors don't want to "waste" their time. I happen to agree with you that proper enforcement of existing laws would be a better plan than more grand-standing with the law while accomplishing very little in reality. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Senate rejects expanded background checks
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom