Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Several bills move forward in state legislature
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 2452563" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>It's a small, pinky-toe, crawl in the right direction. In that the <strong><em>non elected</em></strong> employee can set policy as a group, or individually.</p><p></p><p>It's a step backwards in that now they can """"officially"""" set no-guns policies. They could already do that; all they had to do was say: carry allowed, please bring CCW license to office for official permit letter.</p><p></p><p>My main gripe, is a non-elected, public employee / company, gets to set firearms policies. </p><p></p><p>That part of the law needs to be stricken entirely. Either make it law that we can, or law that we can't. Even "may-issue" permits from the local Sheriff are less offensive: there is public recourse against the Sheriff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 2452563, member: 423"] It's a small, pinky-toe, crawl in the right direction. In that the [B][I]non elected[/I][/B] employee can set policy as a group, or individually. It's a step backwards in that now they can """"officially"""" set no-guns policies. They could already do that; all they had to do was say: carry allowed, please bring CCW license to office for official permit letter. My main gripe, is a non-elected, public employee / company, gets to set firearms policies. That part of the law needs to be stricken entirely. Either make it law that we can, or law that we can't. Even "may-issue" permits from the local Sheriff are less offensive: there is public recourse against the Sheriff. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Several bills move forward in state legislature
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
