Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
She signed it, fellas
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inactive" data-source="post: 1795896" data-attributes="member: 7488"><p>It is a pistol, though I too cannot articulate why. I believe the truncated "stock" is not defined as a stock by way of it being truncated, the way the buffer on an AR pistol is not a stock though technically you can shoulder it as one. Because either, if they had a true stock by definition, would be a short barreled rifle and not a pistol. Somehow both skirt that technicality.</p><p></p><p><strong>The bigger point is that </strong>"pistol" in the SDA is a different definition than "pistol" in the NFA and federal regs. As "Pistol" is specifically defined in the SDA, only that definition applies to its use in that particular statute. Sometimes, one definition applies and sometimes the other, and sometimes both. It's all context.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inactive, post: 1795896, member: 7488"] It is a pistol, though I too cannot articulate why. I believe the truncated "stock" is not defined as a stock by way of it being truncated, the way the buffer on an AR pistol is not a stock though technically you can shoulder it as one. Because either, if they had a true stock by definition, would be a short barreled rifle and not a pistol. Somehow both skirt that technicality. [B]The bigger point is that [/B]"pistol" in the SDA is a different definition than "pistol" in the NFA and federal regs. As "Pistol" is specifically defined in the SDA, only that definition applies to its use in that particular statute. Sometimes, one definition applies and sometimes the other, and sometimes both. It's all context. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
She signed it, fellas
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom