Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sheridan, Wyoming - House destroyed during standoff with cop killer
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 4220683" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>I wish I could agree with you, that "if it occurs enough" it will change things but we see multi-million dollar payouts for police actions routinely with no discernible change in behaviors. IMHO the only time that payouts are going to cause behavior change is when it comes from police pensions, or if they are personally held accountable for actions without qualified immunity. Until then, they don't seem to care.</p><p></p><p>Under no circumstance do I believe that option "A" is in any way just or moral so long as the homeowner is innocent. If a perp was in their own house or car or property, I believe it should be non-reimburseable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 4220683, member: 5800"] I wish I could agree with you, that "if it occurs enough" it will change things but we see multi-million dollar payouts for police actions routinely with no discernible change in behaviors. IMHO the only time that payouts are going to cause behavior change is when it comes from police pensions, or if they are personally held accountable for actions without qualified immunity. Until then, they don't seem to care. Under no circumstance do I believe that option "A" is in any way just or moral so long as the homeowner is innocent. If a perp was in their own house or car or property, I believe it should be non-reimburseable. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sheridan, Wyoming - House destroyed during standoff with cop killer
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
