Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Sheriffs in Oregon Defy New Controversial Gun Control Measure
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3898468" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>There is a way to solve this left leaning democratic form of representation. As it stands, the current setup is OK for a house of representatives. It is not good for any form of a senate. Each state's senate (or equivalent) should consist of one senator from each county. That way, nothing will pass that is not good for both the highly populated centers or the rural areas. This will ensure a republican form of government for each state as is required by the Constitution.</p><p></p><p>Article IV, Section 4, of the United States Constitution is quite clear on this issue.</p><p></p><p>This measure would not have passed were it presented in a proper legislative body. The only way it passed is by referendum, and as we can see, it favored the highly populated centers only. (The Second Amendment's protection of the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms considered notwithstanding for the sake of discussion.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3898468, member: 745"] There is a way to solve this left leaning democratic form of representation. As it stands, the current setup is OK for a house of representatives. It is not good for any form of a senate. Each state's senate (or equivalent) should consist of one senator from each county. That way, nothing will pass that is not good for both the highly populated centers or the rural areas. This will ensure a republican form of government for each state as is required by the Constitution. Article IV, Section 4, of the United States Constitution is quite clear on this issue. This measure would not have passed were it presented in a proper legislative body. The only way it passed is by referendum, and as we can see, it favored the highly populated centers only. (The Second Amendment's protection of the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms considered notwithstanding for the sake of discussion.) Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Sheriffs in Oregon Defy New Controversial Gun Control Measure
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
