Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3898709" data-attributes="member: 745">If a person believes a law to be unconstitutional, disobeys said law, gets arrested and arraigned, that person has standing. Such a law can then be challenged as to its constitutionality. If a person doesn't have some sort of standing, the court won't heat the case. Ergo, said person must break said unconstitutional law in order to eventually get relief. If said person believes said law to be unconstitutional, it is only a matter of convincing the court if the unconstitutionality of the law is not within judicial notice. For the common man, the Constitution is written in plain and concise verbiage, and with unambiguous meaning so long as a person can read and understand the English language. Just because agenda driven public servants decide not to abide the Constitution to ply their nefarious means toward their desired end, doesn't mean everyone else must knuckle under to the desires of those bent servants of the people. Just as a soldier doesn't have to obey an unlawful order, neither do We the People.In court, when such a law is challenged, it is those in government who must defend the law on its face, and not anyone who has disobeyed the bad law. So, as you can see, anyone can decide that a law is either constitutional and abide it, or unconstitutional and disobey it. In the latter case, the law can then be challenged because a person or persons believe said law is unconstitutional.We don't live in a dictatorship.Woody</blockquote>

Verification