Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Should sight be a requirement for legal carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 2410483" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>That's what I mean, Brandi... I would like to think a responsible person (a stretch, I know) with limited sight capabilities would use good judgement and only utilize such a dangerous tool if there were no other option AND he knew his target was "almost guaranteed". Such as in a case like Zimmerman (again, looking ONLY at the actual physical confrontation) where someone is imminently and literally ON TOP of you. So Grandpa Munster with his 5-foot range of vision has a thug up in his face trying to assault him or already has him down, the up-close-and-personal shot, almost by FEEL, is the only option.</p><p></p><p>I was trained by a CLEET instructor who had me practice the quick-draw one-handed up-close shot into the gut or chest of an attacker who was essentially at arms length. You use your off-hand to push/hold them back as much as possible, draw and fire by proprioception into the gut or chest. That's pretty much the scenario I'm envisioning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 2410483, member: 9374"] That's what I mean, Brandi... I would like to think a responsible person (a stretch, I know) with limited sight capabilities would use good judgement and only utilize such a dangerous tool if there were no other option AND he knew his target was "almost guaranteed". Such as in a case like Zimmerman (again, looking ONLY at the actual physical confrontation) where someone is imminently and literally ON TOP of you. So Grandpa Munster with his 5-foot range of vision has a thug up in his face trying to assault him or already has him down, the up-close-and-personal shot, almost by FEEL, is the only option. I was trained by a CLEET instructor who had me practice the quick-draw one-handed up-close shot into the gut or chest of an attacker who was essentially at arms length. You use your off-hand to push/hold them back as much as possible, draw and fire by proprioception into the gut or chest. That's pretty much the scenario I'm envisioning. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Should sight be a requirement for legal carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom