Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Sig and HK question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1162053" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>Because they are incredibly reliable but not even close to incredibly accurate - at least not in my opinion re: SIGS</p><p> </p><p>I've owned two P220's over the years, still have one of them. Both fall into the categor of pull trigger and go bang. Every time. EACH AND EVERY TIME. No failure ever of any sorts.</p><p> </p><p>Accuracy - give me a break. CZ-75's hands down more accurate right out of the box. S&W 1911 hands down more accurate right out of the box. Kimber Ultra Tac 2 even with it's 3.00" bbl hands down more accurate out of the box. And all have failed at one time or another over the years and that cannot be said of the Sigs.</p><p> </p><p>Why are Sigs not used in competition (I've not ever seen one used) - good question because reliability is important in competition - I used to use a CZ-75B SA in IPSC shooting - not anymore. Sucker failed on me at an inopportune time. In general when talking IPSC or IDPA reliability and speed are king. As long as the gun is accurate enough to hit the standard sillhouette somewhere it's accurate enough.</p><p> </p><p>That said over the years I've noticed that at the local level anyway 9 out of 10 competition pistols are 1911's. Just the way it is. I started out with a Glock 22, moved to a CZ-75 and ended up using a 1911 myself. Ask me why and I couldn't honestly give an answer. Just the way it worked out.</p><p> </p><p>Along the way it never even occured to me to use my P220's. Just didn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1162053, member: 239"] Because they are incredibly reliable but not even close to incredibly accurate - at least not in my opinion re: SIGS I've owned two P220's over the years, still have one of them. Both fall into the categor of pull trigger and go bang. Every time. EACH AND EVERY TIME. No failure ever of any sorts. Accuracy - give me a break. CZ-75's hands down more accurate right out of the box. S&W 1911 hands down more accurate right out of the box. Kimber Ultra Tac 2 even with it's 3.00" bbl hands down more accurate out of the box. And all have failed at one time or another over the years and that cannot be said of the Sigs. Why are Sigs not used in competition (I've not ever seen one used) - good question because reliability is important in competition - I used to use a CZ-75B SA in IPSC shooting - not anymore. Sucker failed on me at an inopportune time. In general when talking IPSC or IDPA reliability and speed are king. As long as the gun is accurate enough to hit the standard sillhouette somewhere it's accurate enough. That said over the years I've noticed that at the local level anyway 9 out of 10 competition pistols are 1911's. Just the way it is. I started out with a Glock 22, moved to a CZ-75 and ended up using a 1911 myself. Ask me why and I couldn't honestly give an answer. Just the way it worked out. Along the way it never even occured to me to use my P220's. Just didn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Sig and HK question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom