Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Small pickup trucks: opinon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rr2008" data-source="post: 2001305" data-attributes="member: 4073"><p>going to have to go with the ranger, the main reason i say this is that the last changes ford made to the ranger was '02 (i think) since then it tooled on forgotten by ford. I have no experience with the years you have listed, or the other makes listed.</p><p></p><p>I have a '98 Ranger with 166,000 miles, 4.0L V6 auto, bought it new, since the middle of June this year it has been averaging 19.7 mpg combined, and since new combined is 20.345 (note I drive very few highway miles now, I used to have an 80 mile roundtrip commute). When I was driving 80 mile commute I was getting up to 23.5 MPG (season of the year does affect mileage) but only as low as 21.5 MPG. </p><p></p><p>reliability has been fantastic. Over the 14 years I have owned this vehicle following is maintenance (outside normal routine maintenace) that has been required;</p><p>replace heater valve, thermostat, O2 Sensor, plugs and wires, pcv, serpentinve belt, lower ball joints, sway bar end link, cam shaft synchronizer, fuel pump,</p><p>cruise control recall, IAC (idle adustment something), </p><p>hood release cable (twice),</p><p>brake job & wheel bearings (three times), </p><p>battery (three times), </p><p>tires (4th times) .</p><p></p><p>p.s. I had an '88 Ranger 4.0L V6 auto that I put 155,000 on before selling in '96. I think it would have easily gone another 150,000 miles.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rr2008, post: 2001305, member: 4073"] going to have to go with the ranger, the main reason i say this is that the last changes ford made to the ranger was '02 (i think) since then it tooled on forgotten by ford. I have no experience with the years you have listed, or the other makes listed. I have a '98 Ranger with 166,000 miles, 4.0L V6 auto, bought it new, since the middle of June this year it has been averaging 19.7 mpg combined, and since new combined is 20.345 (note I drive very few highway miles now, I used to have an 80 mile roundtrip commute). When I was driving 80 mile commute I was getting up to 23.5 MPG (season of the year does affect mileage) but only as low as 21.5 MPG. reliability has been fantastic. Over the 14 years I have owned this vehicle following is maintenance (outside normal routine maintenace) that has been required; replace heater valve, thermostat, O2 Sensor, plugs and wires, pcv, serpentinve belt, lower ball joints, sway bar end link, cam shaft synchronizer, fuel pump, cruise control recall, IAC (idle adustment something), hood release cable (twice), brake job & wheel bearings (three times), battery (three times), tires (4th times) . p.s. I had an '88 Ranger 4.0L V6 auto that I put 155,000 on before selling in '96. I think it would have easily gone another 150,000 miles. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Small pickup trucks: opinon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom