Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Starting to push it - Where next?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ripnbst" data-source="post: 1438828" data-attributes="member: 16136"><p>If I may offer some advice strictly from a scientific approach POV. I am not a distance shooter but with anything I would make the changes one at a time and see the results. For example, I would take one set (say 20 rnds) and only ream flash holes, another with only one variable changed, another with only one variable changed.</p><p></p><p>This will be tedious but also yield the most information. Once you've done everything see which changes net you the best results vs time it took to do them to see how much time you want to put in for the desired accuracy.</p><p></p><p>Hypothetical situation, I have no idea how long these things take. Say it takes 10 minutes to ream the flash holes on one cartidge including setup, actual reaming, and then changeover to next cartridge and you find that doing this only improves accuracy marginally. Then it take 2 minutes to weigh each charge individually and you see great gains in accuracy by doing this. It becomes apparent where you get the most "bang for your buck". If you are really going for absolute best results no matter if one round takes 2.5 hrs to load then I guess have fun with that and disregard my advice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ripnbst, post: 1438828, member: 16136"] If I may offer some advice strictly from a scientific approach POV. I am not a distance shooter but with anything I would make the changes one at a time and see the results. For example, I would take one set (say 20 rnds) and only ream flash holes, another with only one variable changed, another with only one variable changed. This will be tedious but also yield the most information. Once you've done everything see which changes net you the best results vs time it took to do them to see how much time you want to put in for the desired accuracy. Hypothetical situation, I have no idea how long these things take. Say it takes 10 minutes to ream the flash holes on one cartidge including setup, actual reaming, and then changeover to next cartridge and you find that doing this only improves accuracy marginally. Then it take 2 minutes to weigh each charge individually and you see great gains in accuracy by doing this. It becomes apparent where you get the most "bang for your buck". If you are really going for absolute best results no matter if one round takes 2.5 hrs to load then I guess have fun with that and disregard my advice. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Starting to push it - Where next?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
