Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stitt announces new measures to slow virus spread in Oklahoma
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3461181" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Lots of variables there. I know here we had lots of people declare they'd not shop anywhere with a mandate, so they'd leave and go elsewhere. Then 'elsewhere's' numbers went up.</p><p></p><p>Are people leaving tulsa to avoid the mandate but bringing it back with them? Are people going into work required to wear masks there? We've already discussed the complexities of dining and wearing a mask.</p><p></p><p>For us, positive cases are reported by your county of residence. So if someone left here, got infected and came back, they'd still show as being a positive against our county. Could the same be happening in Tulsa?</p><p></p><p>But i'm also guessing there is evidence from around the world (to confirm or refute) usefulness.</p><p></p><p>As i said, having a county by county mandate did not show meaningful decline here. But a statewide mandate did (as did an increase in cases when that mandate expired). Were other variables at play? Perhaps. Or perhaps it was effective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3461181, member: 277"] Lots of variables there. I know here we had lots of people declare they'd not shop anywhere with a mandate, so they'd leave and go elsewhere. Then 'elsewhere's' numbers went up. Are people leaving tulsa to avoid the mandate but bringing it back with them? Are people going into work required to wear masks there? We've already discussed the complexities of dining and wearing a mask. For us, positive cases are reported by your county of residence. So if someone left here, got infected and came back, they'd still show as being a positive against our county. Could the same be happening in Tulsa? But i'm also guessing there is evidence from around the world (to confirm or refute) usefulness. As i said, having a county by county mandate did not show meaningful decline here. But a statewide mandate did (as did an increase in cases when that mandate expired). Were other variables at play? Perhaps. Or perhaps it was effective. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stitt announces new measures to slow virus spread in Oklahoma
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom