Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stop Ignoring Double Jeopardy
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="okierider" data-source="post: 3181409" data-attributes="member: 41708"><p>OK so not enough evidence to find someone guilty of a crime would say to me there is not enough evidence in a civil case. I know OJ's trial was a travesty and I am glad the families got a little "justice " in civil court, but "not enough evidence" should not change whether it be civil or criminal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="okierider, post: 3181409, member: 41708"] OK so not enough evidence to find someone guilty of a crime would say to me there is not enough evidence in a civil case. I know OJ's trial was a travesty and I am glad the families got a little "justice " in civil court, but "not enough evidence" should not change whether it be civil or criminal. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Stop Ignoring Double Jeopardy
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom