Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Study: Tesla car battery production releases as much CO2 as 8 years of driving on gas
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3002875" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>The proper comparison for a battery would be a gas tank.</p><p></p><p>A <em>meaningful</em> comparison would be the vehicle as a whole: battery to gas tank, internal combustion engine to multiple electric motors (including the environmentally-scandalous rare-earth magnets required to make them), the steel body panels to the lightweight plastics (and the oil to produce them), etc. Who cares about just a battery? Without anything else, it's just something on which I can stub my toe. Give me total (environmental) cost of ownership, from the time all of the raw materials are in the ground until the end of its service life (200k miles, perhaps?), including all necessary fuel/energy inputs throughout, all repairs, etc. From there, adjust it for passenger-miles (based on <em>typical</em> occupancy, not maximum), cargo ton-miles (ditto), whatever is the vehicle's major purpose. Anything else is cherry-picked propaganda.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3002875, member: 13624"] The proper comparison for a battery would be a gas tank. A [I]meaningful[/I] comparison would be the vehicle as a whole: battery to gas tank, internal combustion engine to multiple electric motors (including the environmentally-scandalous rare-earth magnets required to make them), the steel body panels to the lightweight plastics (and the oil to produce them), etc. Who cares about just a battery? Without anything else, it's just something on which I can stub my toe. Give me total (environmental) cost of ownership, from the time all of the raw materials are in the ground until the end of its service life (200k miles, perhaps?), including all necessary fuel/energy inputs throughout, all repairs, etc. From there, adjust it for passenger-miles (based on [I]typical[/I] occupancy, not maximum), cargo ton-miles (ditto), whatever is the vehicle's major purpose. Anything else is cherry-picked propaganda. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Study: Tesla car battery production releases as much CO2 as 8 years of driving on gas
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom