Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Suit Filed to Stop Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3286248" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>Yeah, as far as I know (standard disclaimer that I'm not a lawyer) the only thing the SC could do is issue a temporary stay until they could hear the case. BUT... there is a lower court ruling that they don't have a case, so there would have to be something specific about the case on which to overrule it on appeal. I believe the standard is to assume the lower court got it right, unless there is some specific compelling argument that they didn't. I assume, like the Fed SC, they may decline to even consider the case without a compelling argument that the lower court ruling is incorrect. I think it's a higher standard than the lower court.</p><p></p><p>I could be wrong about any/all of that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3286248, member: 44328"] Yeah, as far as I know (standard disclaimer that I'm not a lawyer) the only thing the SC could do is issue a temporary stay until they could hear the case. BUT... there is a lower court ruling that they don't have a case, so there would have to be something specific about the case on which to overrule it on appeal. I believe the standard is to assume the lower court got it right, unless there is some specific compelling argument that they didn't. I assume, like the Fed SC, they may decline to even consider the case without a compelling argument that the lower court ruling is incorrect. I think it's a higher standard than the lower court. I could be wrong about any/all of that. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Suit Filed to Stop Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom