Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court says eastern half of Oklahoma is Native American land
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PBramble" data-source="post: 3390254" data-attributes="member: 5778"><p>But for all intents and purposes, it is about land ownership. </p><p>From the article:</p><p>The case sprang from the conviction of Creek member Jimcy McGirt in an Oklahoma court of raping a 4-year-old child on land whose ownership was in dispute in the case.</p><p>and</p><p>“But, in seeking to defend the state court judgment below, Oklahoma has put aside whatever procedural defenses it might have and asked us to confirm that the land once given to the Creeks is no longer a reservation today.”</p><p>Gorsuch flatly rejected that request by the state.</p><p></p><p>Depending on the wording of the treaty and what is or is not allowed on tribal land, this could be a huge change for Oklahoma. I'm not familiar with the rules, regulations and laws on reservation land in Oklahoma. Not just hunting and fishing, but look at the water rights battles going on in this state. This should be interesting to figure out, but I'm sure the tribes will tell us what they expect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PBramble, post: 3390254, member: 5778"] But for all intents and purposes, it is about land ownership. From the article: The case sprang from the conviction of Creek member Jimcy McGirt in an Oklahoma court of raping a 4-year-old child on land whose ownership was in dispute in the case. and “But, in seeking to defend the state court judgment below, Oklahoma has put aside whatever procedural defenses it might have and asked us to confirm that the land once given to the Creeks is no longer a reservation today.” Gorsuch flatly rejected that request by the state. Depending on the wording of the treaty and what is or is not allowed on tribal land, this could be a huge change for Oklahoma. I'm not familiar with the rules, regulations and laws on reservation land in Oklahoma. Not just hunting and fishing, but look at the water rights battles going on in this state. This should be interesting to figure out, but I'm sure the tribes will tell us what they expect. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court says eastern half of Oklahoma is Native American land
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom