Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court Will Decide If Civil Forfeiture Is Unconstitutional, Violates The Eighth Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3136709" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>No different than any other job that offers incentives. That money helps to buys new cars, new equipment, etc. Say the police bust a drug ring and seize $250k in cash. Why should that go to the state (and end up in a politicians pocket)? The cops did the work. And the argument that there is a possibility (yes, I know it has happened) for manufactured cases to claim seized items is flimsy. That same argument could be used in many scenarios to limit or remove an activity. </p><p></p><p>The point though, is civil forfeiture is wrong. Seizing assets that were used in the commission of a crime as evidence is different. Upon a guilty conviction those assets should be forfeited. If found innocent or charges dropped, all seized items, including cash, should be returned to the accused.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3136709, member: 43724"] No different than any other job that offers incentives. That money helps to buys new cars, new equipment, etc. Say the police bust a drug ring and seize $250k in cash. Why should that go to the state (and end up in a politicians pocket)? The cops did the work. And the argument that there is a possibility (yes, I know it has happened) for manufactured cases to claim seized items is flimsy. That same argument could be used in many scenarios to limit or remove an activity. The point though, is civil forfeiture is wrong. Seizing assets that were used in the commission of a crime as evidence is different. Upon a guilty conviction those assets should be forfeited. If found innocent or charges dropped, all seized items, including cash, should be returned to the accused. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court Will Decide If Civil Forfeiture Is Unconstitutional, Violates The Eighth Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom