Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tam on Arming Teachers
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3099902" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I disagree. Armed guards at the gate (which further implies a fence with gates), again at the door (which presupposes a number of doors few enough to maintain such staffing), and yet again throughout? That's very much a prison.</p><p></p><p>My high school had no such fence, and had far too many exterior doors to reasonably guard. You just couldn't have that many people moving (~2400 students--plus staff--twenty years ago) in and out in the necessary period of time without that many doors. And those armed guards would have to be supplanted by metal detectors, or they'd just be window dressing. Fence it all in? Okay, but again, you're talking probably ~500-600 cars, mostly entering and leaving in the space of, say, an hour...unless you plan for putting parking outside the wall, which just creates another choke point (as well as being untenable in the winter).</p><p></p><p>And, if you think this is a good idea...who's going to pay or it? A high school, a middle school or two (we had three), a handful of elementary schools...aren't our schools in poor enough financial shape as it is?</p><p></p><p>Allowing teachers to arm themselves is one thing, and I think a very good idea; having <em>multiple </em>layers of armed checkpoint security is more than most military bases get (which typically just have a gate guard, with a few buildings perhaps having further security). It is, in short, a description of a prison.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3099902, member: 13624"] I disagree. Armed guards at the gate (which further implies a fence with gates), again at the door (which presupposes a number of doors few enough to maintain such staffing), and yet again throughout? That's very much a prison. My high school had no such fence, and had far too many exterior doors to reasonably guard. You just couldn't have that many people moving (~2400 students--plus staff--twenty years ago) in and out in the necessary period of time without that many doors. And those armed guards would have to be supplanted by metal detectors, or they'd just be window dressing. Fence it all in? Okay, but again, you're talking probably ~500-600 cars, mostly entering and leaving in the space of, say, an hour...unless you plan for putting parking outside the wall, which just creates another choke point (as well as being untenable in the winter). And, if you think this is a good idea...who's going to pay or it? A high school, a middle school or two (we had three), a handful of elementary schools...aren't our schools in poor enough financial shape as it is? Allowing teachers to arm themselves is one thing, and I think a very good idea; having [I]multiple [/I]layers of armed checkpoint security is more than most military bases get (which typically just have a gate guard, with a few buildings perhaps having further security). It is, in short, a description of a prison. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tam on Arming Teachers
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom