Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus over Glock...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1758080" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>It's not hard to imagine that at a gun race there will be a bunch of race guns ....</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By the same logic Savage can't make a decent rifle .... You get issued what you get issued.</p><p></p><p>As far as competitors go - it's catch 22: they'll use whatever is the most supported and whatever gets used the most, gets most support. Point being, Glock-34 - great race gun, it is the most used race gun by FAR (and 17s converted to 34 and you got 50% covered), however - it has NO USE outside the competition circle.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>I have no feelings towards <em>any</em><strong>*</strong> brand name - gun is a tool and it either works or it doesn't. </p><p><em>* Remington is a sole exception - IMHO they haven't made a decent gun since 1945.</em></p><p></p><p>I've had a dozen Taurus/Rossi firearms over the years and the only issue I've ever had was a timing problem with a used revolver that I was able to correct at home. Now, the accounts of guns failing at simple CHL test or a sub-1000-round class really worry me. </p><p></p><p>With that said - I still own a few and if there are indeed problems with them - I want to know what the problems are <strong>now</strong> so I can correct it.</p><p></p><p>P.S. PT92 is a standard issue for Brazilian Army - that's 250 thou units...</p><p></p><p>P.P.S. Would I take new Taurus <strong>over</strong> used Glock - HELL NO! <img src="/images/smilies/new/angry3.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angry3:" title="Angry3 :angry3:" data-shortname=":angry3:" /> Luckily I don't have to make a choice. Safety on a handgun pisses me off ....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1758080, member: 3455"] It's not hard to imagine that at a gun race there will be a bunch of race guns .... By the same logic Savage can't make a decent rifle .... You get issued what you get issued. As far as competitors go - it's catch 22: they'll use whatever is the most supported and whatever gets used the most, gets most support. Point being, Glock-34 - great race gun, it is the most used race gun by FAR (and 17s converted to 34 and you got 50% covered), however - it has NO USE outside the competition circle. I have no feelings towards [i]any[/i][b]*[/b] brand name - gun is a tool and it either works or it doesn't. [i]* Remington is a sole exception - IMHO they haven't made a decent gun since 1945.[/i] I've had a dozen Taurus/Rossi firearms over the years and the only issue I've ever had was a timing problem with a used revolver that I was able to correct at home. Now, the accounts of guns failing at simple CHL test or a sub-1000-round class really worry me. With that said - I still own a few and if there are indeed problems with them - I want to know what the problems are [b]now[/b] so I can correct it. P.S. PT92 is a standard issue for Brazilian Army - that's 250 thou units... P.P.S. Would I take new Taurus [b]over[/b] used Glock - HELL NO! :angry3: Luckily I don't have to make a choice. Safety on a handgun pisses me off .... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus over Glock...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom