Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus over Glock...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1758280" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>Are you saying that 34 is not specifically designed for competition or that it's not the most used Glock in competition? <img src="/images/smilies/headscratch.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":scratch:" title="Headscratch :scratch:" data-shortname=":scratch:" /></p><p></p><p>My argument was that Glock design fits competition style shooting very well (large capacity + no external safety + 20 year head start), and they offer a model tailored for competition; therefore bringing the fact that it's used in competition, especially "stock" divisions, is kind of redundant.</p><p></p><p>With that said, Glock fails to meet most countries' military requirements and consumer's personal preference (namely lack of external safety).</p><p></p><p>None of this somehow takes away from Glock's reputation for reliability, durability etc ... nor somehow automatically proves that Taurus is an inferior gun.</p><p></p><p>I honestly don't know which crowd is worse - 1911 or Glock, every time you say that one of them is not the greatest thing since sliced bread - Jesus kills a kitten.</p><p></p><p>P.S. You know what else is Austria known for ... yeah, Hitler and Bruno!!! <img src="/images/smilies/new/pms2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":pms2:" title="Pms2 :pms2:" data-shortname=":pms2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1758280, member: 3455"] Are you saying that 34 is not specifically designed for competition or that it's not the most used Glock in competition? :scratch: My argument was that Glock design fits competition style shooting very well (large capacity + no external safety + 20 year head start), and they offer a model tailored for competition; therefore bringing the fact that it's used in competition, especially "stock" divisions, is kind of redundant. With that said, Glock fails to meet most countries' military requirements and consumer's personal preference (namely lack of external safety). None of this somehow takes away from Glock's reputation for reliability, durability etc ... nor somehow automatically proves that Taurus is an inferior gun. I honestly don't know which crowd is worse - 1911 or Glock, every time you say that one of them is not the greatest thing since sliced bread - Jesus kills a kitten. P.S. You know what else is Austria known for ... yeah, Hitler and Bruno!!! :pms2: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus over Glock...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom