Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Terminal Ballistics from the Morgue
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 1200419" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>Having shot lots of .357, I hate it for the mz blast. Even with muffs its deafening. A round that is just as fast is the .44 mag with a larger bullet. Its not a carry weapon, but its boom is much less than the Crack of the .357.</p><p></p><p>I read this report on KTOG several years ago and totally respect the guys opinion. </p><p>I also know that new ammo in 9mm and .380 have vastly improved their usefullness in SD.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 1200419, member: 5412"] Having shot lots of .357, I hate it for the mz blast. Even with muffs its deafening. A round that is just as fast is the .44 mag with a larger bullet. Its not a carry weapon, but its boom is much less than the Crack of the .357. I read this report on KTOG several years ago and totally respect the guys opinion. I also know that new ammo in 9mm and .380 have vastly improved their usefullness in SD. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Terminal Ballistics from the Morgue
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
