Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas Governor Greg Abbott pardons Daniel Perry after conviction for shooting armed agitator during BLM riots
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cryhavoc33" data-source="post: 4267046" data-attributes="member: 52071"><p>Guilt by association, and a party to a crime being committed so imo there never should have been charges brought against the Uber driver. But with the current state of this country and it's judicial system I am not surprised in the least. It's a shame law abiding citizens have to have their name and information spread all over the place by the media when they were simply acting in self defense against these woke extremists, which is potentially putting a target on their back for all of the extremist "peaceful protestor" types they've already had to go through hell for defending themselves from that are itching to become some kind of "hero" within the woke "peaceful protestor" community that want to erase history along with all of our constitutional rights. </p><p></p><p>Even though Fosters defense was trying to say He wasn't the one who shot at Perry, by law Foster was an accomplice, and if he wanted to remove himself from the category of being an accomplice he should have used that AK of his to put an end to his accomplices attack on the Uber driver instead of choosing to stand by, failing to prevent the commission of the crime. </p><p></p><p>It's a wild time to be alive</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cryhavoc33, post: 4267046, member: 52071"] Guilt by association, and a party to a crime being committed so imo there never should have been charges brought against the Uber driver. But with the current state of this country and it's judicial system I am not surprised in the least. It's a shame law abiding citizens have to have their name and information spread all over the place by the media when they were simply acting in self defense against these woke extremists, which is potentially putting a target on their back for all of the extremist "peaceful protestor" types they've already had to go through hell for defending themselves from that are itching to become some kind of "hero" within the woke "peaceful protestor" community that want to erase history along with all of our constitutional rights. Even though Fosters defense was trying to say He wasn't the one who shot at Perry, by law Foster was an accomplice, and if he wanted to remove himself from the category of being an accomplice he should have used that AK of his to put an end to his accomplices attack on the Uber driver instead of choosing to stand by, failing to prevent the commission of the crime. It's a wild time to be alive [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas Governor Greg Abbott pardons Daniel Perry after conviction for shooting armed agitator during BLM riots
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom