Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The 25-Year 'Foreclosure From Hell'
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="striker754" data-source="post: 1388851" data-attributes="member: 6004"><p>If you want to call it that, sure. But what matters is the law and the law does not bring morality into the situation because morals are subjective. Contracts spell out exactly what is to happen if someone does not pay or what happens in the event of any other situation. As a co-signer you know what you are getting into. Maybe the co-signer needs to do some DD. Underwriting is a key part of making loans. It takes two to tango.</p><p></p><p>To say that morality not being involved in debt is socialism is outrageous. On a mortgage or any other secured loan, if you don't pay, the bank takes the property back. The contract stipulates that the lender is made whole by seizing of the collateral. On unsecured debt, the higher interest rate compensates for no collateral. This is standard contract law and one of the basics of a free market lending system.</p><p></p><p>If the bank can't keep their paperwork and note assignments up to date and in order, then tough **** for the bank. The law is supposed to work both ways. This lady is using the courts to ensure she is justly treated. Obviously the lenders do not have their stuff together in the eyes of the courts.</p><p></p><p>Morality is a BS argument used by lenders to squeeze the last dollar out of people when in fact people should be either walking away or taking other action.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="striker754, post: 1388851, member: 6004"] If you want to call it that, sure. But what matters is the law and the law does not bring morality into the situation because morals are subjective. Contracts spell out exactly what is to happen if someone does not pay or what happens in the event of any other situation. As a co-signer you know what you are getting into. Maybe the co-signer needs to do some DD. Underwriting is a key part of making loans. It takes two to tango. To say that morality not being involved in debt is socialism is outrageous. On a mortgage or any other secured loan, if you don't pay, the bank takes the property back. The contract stipulates that the lender is made whole by seizing of the collateral. On unsecured debt, the higher interest rate compensates for no collateral. This is standard contract law and one of the basics of a free market lending system. If the bank can't keep their paperwork and note assignments up to date and in order, then tough **** for the bank. The law is supposed to work both ways. This lady is using the courts to ensure she is justly treated. Obviously the lenders do not have their stuff together in the eyes of the courts. Morality is a BS argument used by lenders to squeeze the last dollar out of people when in fact people should be either walking away or taking other action. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The 25-Year 'Foreclosure From Hell'
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom