Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Audacity of Corruption
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 1921827" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">I used to "converse" online with a gentleman via a blog's comment section. I tried to get him to read the book by Bernard Goldberg entitled, "Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News." He was always claiming that the news media was NOT biased at all. After a fairly long period of time, he finally admitted that he had "neither the interest nor inclination" to read the book. That seemed strange to me as he always stated that we should examine more than one source. Come to find out later, I found him on a photography site where he stated his occupation as "photo-journalist."</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">While I don't watch a lot of any of the television news programs, I tend to lean toward FOX simply because I can't stand the blatant bias on CBS and NBC. (Haven't watched much of ABC.) Back after the 2008 Democratic Presidential primary, one of Hillary's top campaign people signed on as a "contributor" to FOX. When asked about it, he stated that FOX was the ONLY network that gave any fair coverage to Hillary and her campaign.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 1921827, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]I used to "converse" online with a gentleman via a blog's comment section. I tried to get him to read the book by Bernard Goldberg entitled, "Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News." He was always claiming that the news media was NOT biased at all. After a fairly long period of time, he finally admitted that he had "neither the interest nor inclination" to read the book. That seemed strange to me as he always stated that we should examine more than one source. Come to find out later, I found him on a photography site where he stated his occupation as "photo-journalist." While I don't watch a lot of any of the television news programs, I tend to lean toward FOX simply because I can't stand the blatant bias on CBS and NBC. (Haven't watched much of ABC.) Back after the 2008 Democratic Presidential primary, one of Hillary's top campaign people signed on as a "contributor" to FOX. When asked about it, he stated that FOX was the ONLY network that gave any fair coverage to Hillary and her campaign. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Audacity of Corruption
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom