Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The Economics of Gun Control
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="R. Johnson" data-source="post: 2111685" data-attributes="member: 10606"><p>So in Colorado they want a gun purchaser to pay the fee for the background check at the time of purchase, and in New York they want gun owners to carry one million dollars in liability coverage. It kind of makes me think of voter ID laws. One of the left's arguments against requiring voter ID at the polls is that a state issued ID typically costs a fee, and it is discriminatory towards people who are poor and can not afford an ID.</p><p></p><p>How is requiring expensive insurance, or additional fees for a service our tax dollars have already paid for not the same thing? It makes it more costly to exercise a divine right, and for people with fixed incomes these costs may make the exercise of that right impossible. The hypocrisy kills me. Now I know, guns are usually pretty expensive, so if you have the money to spend on one, you've probably got the extra cash to pay the fee. That's not the point. You are being forced to pay money to someone else for the "privilege" of exercising your Constitutional rights, and that is just like a poll tax, and it is unconstitutional. </p><p></p><p>It just drives me nuts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="R. Johnson, post: 2111685, member: 10606"] So in Colorado they want a gun purchaser to pay the fee for the background check at the time of purchase, and in New York they want gun owners to carry one million dollars in liability coverage. It kind of makes me think of voter ID laws. One of the left's arguments against requiring voter ID at the polls is that a state issued ID typically costs a fee, and it is discriminatory towards people who are poor and can not afford an ID. How is requiring expensive insurance, or additional fees for a service our tax dollars have already paid for not the same thing? It makes it more costly to exercise a divine right, and for people with fixed incomes these costs may make the exercise of that right impossible. The hypocrisy kills me. Now I know, guns are usually pretty expensive, so if you have the money to spend on one, you've probably got the extra cash to pay the fee. That's not the point. You are being forced to pay money to someone else for the "privilege" of exercising your Constitutional rights, and that is just like a poll tax, and it is unconstitutional. It just drives me nuts. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The Economics of Gun Control
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom