Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The fallacy of 'Behind every blade of grass' thinking
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="71buickfreak" data-source="post: 1837086" data-attributes="member: 8373"><p>It depends on who is the aggressor. If it is Americans vs. American soldiers, I think you see the armed forces ranked quickly depleting and the civilian ranks growing in experience, weaponry and tactics. I don't think many American soldiers would be too willing to fire upon their own. Maybe in the start, but not for long. </p><p></p><p>If it were say China, then we would still have better armament, as the US armed forces would be there fighting along side the civies. Besides, you take a few armored tank groups with some claymores in the tress and you can grab all the RPGs and Ak47s you need. Oh, wait, that was Red Dawn. Wolverines! Hell, they did it with a hand full of bolt actions, a couple bows and grandaddy's pistol.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="71buickfreak, post: 1837086, member: 8373"] It depends on who is the aggressor. If it is Americans vs. American soldiers, I think you see the armed forces ranked quickly depleting and the civilian ranks growing in experience, weaponry and tactics. I don't think many American soldiers would be too willing to fire upon their own. Maybe in the start, but not for long. If it were say China, then we would still have better armament, as the US armed forces would be there fighting along side the civies. Besides, you take a few armored tank groups with some claymores in the tress and you can grab all the RPGs and Ak47s you need. Oh, wait, that was Red Dawn. Wolverines! Hell, they did it with a hand full of bolt actions, a couple bows and grandaddy's pistol. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The fallacy of 'Behind every blade of grass' thinking
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
