Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
The Fed's 'hidden agenda' behind money-printing
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike_60" data-source="post: 2300271" data-attributes="member: 16957"><p>The Fed's 'hidden agenda' behind money-printing</p><p>CNBC Published: Wednesday, 25 Sep 2013 | 12:04 PM ET</p><p>By: Peter J. Tanous</p><p></p><p></p><p>The markets were surprised when the Federal Reserve did not announce a tapering of the quantitative easing bond buying program at its September meeting. Indeed, its signal to the market that it was keeping interest rates low was welcome, but there may be a hidden agenda.</p><p></p><p>Since it began in late 2008, QE has spurred a vigorous debate about its merits, both positive and negative.</p><p></p><p>On the positive side, the easy money and low interest rates resulting from quantitative easing have been a shot in the arm to the economy, fueling the stock market and helping the housing recovery. On the negative side, The Fed accomplished QE by "printing money" to buy Treasurys, and through the massive power of its purchases drove interest rates to record lows.</p><p></p><p>But in the process, the Fed accumulated an unprecedented balance sheet of more than $3.6 trillion which needs to go somewhere, someday.</p><p></p><p>But we know all this.</p><p></p><p>I believe that one of the most important reasons the Fed is determined to keep interest rates low is one that is rarely talked about, and which comprises a dark economic foreboding that should frighten us all. </p><p></p><p>Let me start with a question: How would you feel if you knew that almost all of the money you pay in personal income tax went to pay just one bill, the interest on the debt? Chances are, you and millions of Americans would find that completely unacceptable and indeed they should.</p><p></p><p>But that is where we may be heading.</p><p></p><p>Thanks to the Fed, the interest rate paid on our national debt is at an historic low of 2.4 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.</p><p></p><p>Given the U.S.'s huge accumulated deficit, this low interest rate is important to keep debt servicing costs down.</p><p></p><p>But isn't it fair to ask what the interest cost of our debt would be if interest rates returned to a more normal level? What's a normal level? How about the average interest rate the Treasury paid on U.S. debt over the last 20 years? </p><p></p><p> That rate is 5.7percent, not extravagantly high at all by historic standards.</p><p></p><p>So here's where it gets scary: U.S. debt held by the public today is about $12 trillion. The budget deficit projections are going down, true, but the United States is still incurring an annual budget deficit by spending more than we take in in taxes and revenue.</p><p></p><p>The CBO estimates that by 2020 total debt held by the public will be $16.6 trillion as a result of the rising accumulated debt.</p><p></p><p>Do the math: If we were to pay an average interest rate on our debt of 5.7 percent, rather than the 2.4 percent we pay today, in 2020 our debt service cost will be about $930 billion.</p><p></p><p>Now compare that to the amount the Internal Revenue Service collects from us in personal income taxes.</p><p></p><p>In 2012, that amount was $1.1 trillion, meaning that if interest rates went back to a more normal level of, say, 5.7 percent, 85 percent of all personal income taxes collected would go to servicing the debt. No wonder the Fed is worried.</p><p></p><p>Some economists will also suggest that interest rates may go much higher than 5.7 percent largely as a result of the massive QE exercise of printing money at an unprecedented rate. We just don't know what the effect of all this will be but many economists warn that it can only result in inflation down the road.</p><p></p><p> As of today, interest rates are rising, and if this is a turning point, it is a major one.</p><p></p><p>Rates in the U.S. peaked in 1980 (remember the 14 percent Treasury bonds?) so if we are at the point of reversing a 33-year downward trend, who wants to predict how this will affect the economy?</p><p></p><p>One thing is clear: Based on CBO projections, if interest rates just rise to their 20-year average, we will have an untenable, unacceptable interest rate bill whose beneficiaries are China, Japan, and others who own our bonds.</p><p></p><p>And if Americans find out that the lion's share of their income tax payments are going to service the debt, prepare for a new American revolution. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101062461?__source=yahoo|finance|headline|headline|story&par=yahoo&doc=101062461|The%20Fed%27s%20%27hidden%20agenda%27" target="_blank">http://www.cnbc.com/id/101062461?__source=yahoo|finance|headline|headline|story&par=yahoo&doc=101062461|The Fed's 'hidden agenda'</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike_60, post: 2300271, member: 16957"] The Fed's 'hidden agenda' behind money-printing CNBC Published: Wednesday, 25 Sep 2013 | 12:04 PM ET By: Peter J. Tanous The markets were surprised when the Federal Reserve did not announce a tapering of the quantitative easing bond buying program at its September meeting. Indeed, its signal to the market that it was keeping interest rates low was welcome, but there may be a hidden agenda. Since it began in late 2008, QE has spurred a vigorous debate about its merits, both positive and negative. On the positive side, the easy money and low interest rates resulting from quantitative easing have been a shot in the arm to the economy, fueling the stock market and helping the housing recovery. On the negative side, The Fed accomplished QE by "printing money" to buy Treasurys, and through the massive power of its purchases drove interest rates to record lows. But in the process, the Fed accumulated an unprecedented balance sheet of more than $3.6 trillion which needs to go somewhere, someday. But we know all this. I believe that one of the most important reasons the Fed is determined to keep interest rates low is one that is rarely talked about, and which comprises a dark economic foreboding that should frighten us all. Let me start with a question: How would you feel if you knew that almost all of the money you pay in personal income tax went to pay just one bill, the interest on the debt? Chances are, you and millions of Americans would find that completely unacceptable and indeed they should. But that is where we may be heading. Thanks to the Fed, the interest rate paid on our national debt is at an historic low of 2.4 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Given the U.S.'s huge accumulated deficit, this low interest rate is important to keep debt servicing costs down. But isn't it fair to ask what the interest cost of our debt would be if interest rates returned to a more normal level? What's a normal level? How about the average interest rate the Treasury paid on U.S. debt over the last 20 years? That rate is 5.7percent, not extravagantly high at all by historic standards. So here's where it gets scary: U.S. debt held by the public today is about $12 trillion. The budget deficit projections are going down, true, but the United States is still incurring an annual budget deficit by spending more than we take in in taxes and revenue. The CBO estimates that by 2020 total debt held by the public will be $16.6 trillion as a result of the rising accumulated debt. Do the math: If we were to pay an average interest rate on our debt of 5.7 percent, rather than the 2.4 percent we pay today, in 2020 our debt service cost will be about $930 billion. Now compare that to the amount the Internal Revenue Service collects from us in personal income taxes. In 2012, that amount was $1.1 trillion, meaning that if interest rates went back to a more normal level of, say, 5.7 percent, 85 percent of all personal income taxes collected would go to servicing the debt. No wonder the Fed is worried. Some economists will also suggest that interest rates may go much higher than 5.7 percent largely as a result of the massive QE exercise of printing money at an unprecedented rate. We just don't know what the effect of all this will be but many economists warn that it can only result in inflation down the road. As of today, interest rates are rising, and if this is a turning point, it is a major one. Rates in the U.S. peaked in 1980 (remember the 14 percent Treasury bonds?) so if we are at the point of reversing a 33-year downward trend, who wants to predict how this will affect the economy? One thing is clear: Based on CBO projections, if interest rates just rise to their 20-year average, we will have an untenable, unacceptable interest rate bill whose beneficiaries are China, Japan, and others who own our bonds. And if Americans find out that the lion's share of their income tax payments are going to service the debt, prepare for a new American revolution. [url]http://www.cnbc.com/id/101062461?__source=yahoo|finance|headline|headline|story&par=yahoo&doc=101062461|The%20Fed%27s%20%27hidden%20agenda%27[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
The Fed's 'hidden agenda' behind money-printing
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom