Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The first victim of NDAA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 1878174" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>True, we cannot judge, but we can (and should) question. We don't have to believe the process is working as it's supposed to - it often times is not (and appears to be getting worse lately). There's nothing wrong with someone reporting him and there's nothing wrong with him being questioned and/or investigated. The Psych hold appears to be a bit much based on what we know (again, there could be a lot more), but the fact that all of this occurred over song lyrics is what seems ridiculous to me. I would love to know what was found that indicated the need for a Psych hold (and like has been stated, I would love to know if he was searched without consent / a warrant).</p><p></p><p>I do see the other side to it though, actions need to be taken to prevent crimes like Columbine / Aurora (especially when there is probable cause for concern before hand and things are reported by fellow citizens), but that's a Grey area that is seriously scary to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 1878174, member: 229"] True, we cannot judge, but we can (and should) question. We don't have to believe the process is working as it's supposed to - it often times is not (and appears to be getting worse lately). There's nothing wrong with someone reporting him and there's nothing wrong with him being questioned and/or investigated. The Psych hold appears to be a bit much based on what we know (again, there could be a lot more), but the fact that all of this occurred over song lyrics is what seems ridiculous to me. I would love to know what was found that indicated the need for a Psych hold (and like has been stated, I would love to know if he was searched without consent / a warrant). I do see the other side to it though, actions need to be taken to prevent crimes like Columbine / Aurora (especially when there is probable cause for concern before hand and things are reported by fellow citizens), but that's a Grey area that is seriously scary to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The first victim of NDAA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom