Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The gun grabbers/haters just can’t get their facts/lies straight on AR-15s
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rc508pir" data-source="post: 3320371" data-attributes="member: 40091"><p>Well, see thats my point to begin with. The 2nd explicitly protects the right to be armed, most importantly, to protect the security of a free state. In order for that to happen, every able bodied American should have a military type weapon. Every able bodied American is, afterall a citizen soldier.</p><p></p><p>This constant sparing of wording is ridiculous. Whether or not the AR15 is full auto or not is irrelevant. If the Military decided to take the select fire switch off M4s or any future adopted weapon still makes them a military weapon.</p><p></p><p>Like I said previously, 99% of Combat Arms branches ie Infantry in the Army and USMC dont even train for the use of full auto by rifleman (The MC does for Automatic Rifleman because they have switched from the M249 to the HK variant) Training doctrine for Marksmanship in both services remains "one shot one kill"</p><p></p><p>To those that say the AR-15 isn't a military weapon, know what youre talking about before you chime in. The AR-15 was introduced by Armalite. Bought by Colt as the AR-15 and adopted by the Military as the M16/A1.... etc. A AR15 is a dangerous weapon, especially in the hands of a trained individual. The argument that it isn't a "Assault Rifle" is irrelevant. A AR15 is only slightly less lethal without select fire. You could argue that the Semi Auto is more lethal to multiple targets since you are more likely to hit more targets on semi that full auto.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rc508pir, post: 3320371, member: 40091"] Well, see thats my point to begin with. The 2nd explicitly protects the right to be armed, most importantly, to protect the security of a free state. In order for that to happen, every able bodied American should have a military type weapon. Every able bodied American is, afterall a citizen soldier. This constant sparing of wording is ridiculous. Whether or not the AR15 is full auto or not is irrelevant. If the Military decided to take the select fire switch off M4s or any future adopted weapon still makes them a military weapon. Like I said previously, 99% of Combat Arms branches ie Infantry in the Army and USMC dont even train for the use of full auto by rifleman (The MC does for Automatic Rifleman because they have switched from the M249 to the HK variant) Training doctrine for Marksmanship in both services remains "one shot one kill" To those that say the AR-15 isn't a military weapon, know what youre talking about before you chime in. The AR-15 was introduced by Armalite. Bought by Colt as the AR-15 and adopted by the Military as the M16/A1.... etc. A AR15 is a dangerous weapon, especially in the hands of a trained individual. The argument that it isn't a "Assault Rifle" is irrelevant. A AR15 is only slightly less lethal without select fire. You could argue that the Semi Auto is more lethal to multiple targets since you are more likely to hit more targets on semi that full auto. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The gun grabbers/haters just can’t get their facts/lies straight on AR-15s
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom