Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The gun grabbers/haters just can’t get their facts/lies straight on AR-15s
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fredkrueger100" data-source="post: 3320436" data-attributes="member: 24577"><p>None of it matters anyway. We should be able to own ANY weapon we want. The term “military weapon” or “weapon of war” is a term made up to sound scary to the unknowing. But you don’t hear the MSM referring to Sig pistols, glock pistols, 1911’s as “weapons of war”. Why is that? Because they see the AR 15 and it looks exactly like the M16 or M4. So they use their scary terminology to brainwash the people that don’t know any better. Any weapon could be a weapon of war. If you take it to war then it becomes a weapon of war. But that still doesn’t change the fact that the civilian AR15 IS NOT the same as the M16 or M4. One is capable of full auto, burst fire and the other is only capable of semi auto fire. Nobody that I saw ever said anything about how these are used in war. I already knew that most don’t ever use auto or burst. Unless trying to suppress an enemy there really isn’t a reason to use it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fredkrueger100, post: 3320436, member: 24577"] None of it matters anyway. We should be able to own ANY weapon we want. The term “military weapon” or “weapon of war” is a term made up to sound scary to the unknowing. But you don’t hear the MSM referring to Sig pistols, glock pistols, 1911’s as “weapons of war”. Why is that? Because they see the AR 15 and it looks exactly like the M16 or M4. So they use their scary terminology to brainwash the people that don’t know any better. Any weapon could be a weapon of war. If you take it to war then it becomes a weapon of war. But that still doesn’t change the fact that the civilian AR15 IS NOT the same as the M16 or M4. One is capable of full auto, burst fire and the other is only capable of semi auto fire. Nobody that I saw ever said anything about how these are used in war. I already knew that most don’t ever use auto or burst. Unless trying to suppress an enemy there really isn’t a reason to use it. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The gun grabbers/haters just can’t get their facts/lies straight on AR-15s
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom